This looks like a good hobbyist project. You appear to be doing everything right.
Some things you may want to change:
Over here, native speakers who do not speak well are considered uneducated. When we read English which is not well written it appears to be from an uneducated writer.
We don't think this when something is written by a non-native speaker, but without knowing this most people will think that the article is written by an uneducated native speaker.
You might consider having a native English speaker go through it and reorder some of the words, or make a statement that you are not native English speakers. Either would be fine.
Consider changing some of the writing in your web page:
1) The measure of radiation dosage is "Sievert", not "Servant" as shown on your site. This fairly leaps out to a native speaker and should be corrected.
2) The diodes you use are "Zeners", not "Zenners".
3) There are some awkward English phrases in the description.
===========
From the circuit, it would appear that the high voltage output is regulated, but to only a single value. Each type of tube has a "plateau" value of voltage which is optimal for that tube and which is the correct voltage to use.
This article tells how to determine the correct voltage for each type of tube:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Home ... essage/168Your counter would be better if there were a way to select the correct voltage, and a table that lists the correct voltage for each tube.
===========
Geiger tubes have an aperture and a capture ratio. The aperture is the area of the tube which lets radiation in, and the capture ratio is a fixed number which is different for each type of tube.
Big tubes have large apertures and small "end window" tubes have tiny apertures. This means that the smaller end-window tubes are good for pointing at objects to tell if they are radioactive, but much less useful for monitoring the environment. The aperture is so small that it is statistically unlikely for a radioactive particle to pass through.
Big tubes have a larger aperture and are more sensitive, but not directional like the end window tubes. Big tubes are better for measuring overall radiation in the environment.
Consider posting a discussion about the types of tubes and what they are useful for. People will naturally want to purchase the best tube for their purpose, and there is no way to tell from your article.
Consider posting a discussion that talks about integration time and sqrt(n) variation in counts. If people will be using these to measure radiation in the environment, they will want to integrate the counts over a very long time (since the tubes are so small). Knowing what to expect would be helpful to a lot of people.